enterprisearchitect.blogs.ilrt.org Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the enterprisearchitect.blogs.ilrt.org

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host enterprisearchitect.blogs.ilrt.org. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is The University of Bristol .

sparxsystems.co.uk 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called openresty containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

enterprise architecture at bristol nikki rogers' blog describing ea activity at the university of bristol menu home about search for: looking back on year 4 this post is part of a fond farewell to the university of bristol as i have now finished a very enjoyable 4 years as enterprise architect there and i have just moved on to the role of senior enterprise architect at the university down the road – uwe ! uwe are building quite a significant ea capability as from this year, recruiting 3 ea’s in one go, led by an assistant director of it dedicated wholly to strategy and enterprise architecture. it was an opportunity i couldn’t turn down, but it was a difficult decision to leave the university of bristol and i will really miss my fantastic colleagues there. it services at bristol has recently recruited an excellent new cio, darrell sturley , and i think he will help improve all aspects of it considerably over the next few years. i will watch with interest! so, back to the real subject matter of this final post on my blog: what did we achieve through enterprise architecture in my fourth year in the role of bristol’s ea? the two key achievements of this year were the successful launch of master data governance at the university and the beginnings of a robust technical design authority capability from within it services. i’ve blogged quite a lot about master data governance so i will focus here on the major aspects i put effort into to enable governance of our it architecture – through a technical design authority. technical design authority – how? to establish a design authority capability i focussed less on ‘who’ should be ‘the’ authority figure, saying yea or nay to all proposed it implementations and standards, and instead on how such a design authority should behave at the university. or, put another way, i believe the tools and processes are as important as the roles and governance structure put in place for the tda. i designed a process (including a form for people to complete) through which all it change proposals can be submitted – big or small, and whether originating from within it services or from elsewhere (for example through the university’s business case approval process). but i was particularly concerned with the appraisal process being based not on educated guesses, personal views, gut feelings, or even how well presented a proposal might be, but instead on a formal evaluation of the proposal against three things: 1. clearly specified it architecture principles, 2. an understanding of all architectural dependencies, and 3. agreed target architectures. for this to work, documentation is needed. over the year we created the following resources to use in the tda process. 1. it architecture principles i was given a technical architecture team to work with in the last year of my role and this great group of technical experts and i came up with a set of draft principles that we felt were particularly pertinent to the university at this time: these top 8 drill down into sub principles, but we wanted this small number of summary principles so as not to bamboozle people submitting it proposals! i should say that they were linked to higher level, overarching principles published by it services more generally. i am a big fan of how togaf encourages the writing of principles , so we then articulated each principle more precisely. i’ll give one example here (further articulation of the third principle in the list above): it is interesting to note that the implications can often result in actions that need to be taken! implication 3. is particularly relevant to the design authority decision making process. 2. architectural dependencies it is all too easy for, say, someone in the server infrastructure team or the databases team, to come up with an architectural improvement without appreciating the knock on effect on the applications architecture. or vice versa. for example, upgrading to the latest release of oracle or sql server would seem to be a good idea, but clearly not if there are business applications which for ever reason aren’t yet compatible with it and which might stop functioning correctly. similarly, one area of the university might think it a great idea to purchase a new web portal to surface content from their system on the web without realising they are duplicating another web view of information offered via an existing system – ultimately creating an ill-planned web experience for visitors to our website and potentially confusion all round. i have encountered many many examples of where a lack of an holistic understanding of our it architecture has allowed for bad decision making. to counter this we drew up archimate diagrams of our systems architecture. the technical architecture team and i received excellent training from bizzdesign back in january in order to ensure we had several experts within it services able to maintain this documentation centrally going forward. we mapped out our entire infrastructure (virtualised and non virtualised server environments, storage, network, backup services, databases and so on). then we mapped our critical services to it. initially we used the free tool archi to analyse our architectural dependencies, here’s an example (click to enlarge): then, after explaining to the senior management team how valuable it is to be able to understand which architectural components are interrelated to others using a fuller-featured product, we were given the funding to purchase bizzdesign architect licenses. i explained that with good documentation we were also able to understand more about dependencies within our architecture generally – for example here i can show that our student administration system depends on a lot of infrastructure components; we can show very simply via the diagram that if the linux virtualisation platform supporting the web farm should fail, then the web client to the system (sits:evision) would fail too. however, the desktop client (sits:vision) would be unaffected so certain users would still be able to access the system via this. from a design authority point of view, it is valuable to use these architecture documents to ask pertinent questions about the potential for undesirable knock on effects that might occur if a particular it change is approved. 3. target architectures we could draw out target architectures using archimate – these are useful. but i wanted something more accessible for those not familar with that language. i follow work by itana and decided to go with the architecture bricks approach they were evaluating at the time. i developed a template that the nih in the us were using at the time: and the technical architecture team and i produced bricks for 20 major architectural areas we support. here’s an example: i ran a session with the it senior management team where we reviewed the 20 bricks together. it revealed key issues such as the number of retirement targets we had not planned for so far, and the number of – thus far uncoordinated – plans to move to cloud services. from a design authority point of view, once they have been evaluated holistically and approved centrally, the bricks become ‘the bible’. they describe future plans and containment/retirement targets. therefore, for example, if a proposal is offered that attempts to build a new service on something we’ve marked as a retirement target we can have a fully informed conversation about whether to recommend against that. in this respect, the design authority isn’t functioning to try and stop all it plans that run counter to the existing plans. instead it is about making a clear and informed response about the implications to the organisation of deviating from the well thought out it architecture plan. so that’s my top 3 contributions to the establishment of a design authority capability at the university. there are several other governance aspects of course, but as i said earlier, i felt it was key to reduc

URL analysis for enterprisearchitect.blogs.ilrt.org

http://enterprisearchitect.blogs.ilrt.org/2013/09/03/soa-knowledge-exchange-1-day-event-bristol-27th-september-2013/
http://enterprisearchitect.blogs.ilrt.org/category/operating-models/
http://enterprisearchitect.blogs.ilrt.org/category/ea-year-2/
http://enterprisearchitect.blogs.ilrt.org/2014/04/01/spaghetti-grows-in-system-architectures-not-an-april-fools-day-joke/
http://enterprisearchitect.blogs.ilrt.org/category/architecture-principles/
http://enterprisearchitect.blogs.ilrt.org/category/interface-catalogue/feed/
http://enterprisearchitect.blogs.ilrt.org/category/organisational-strategy/feed/
http://enterprisearchitect.blogs.ilrt.org/category/technical-architecture-virtual-team/feed/
http://enterprisearchitect.blogs.ilrt.org/category/soa/
http://enterprisearchitect.blogs.ilrt.org/category/mobile-strategy/

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: ILRT.ORG
Registry Domain ID: D21472152-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server:
Registrar URL: http://www.domainmonster.com
Updated Date: 2017-04-18T00:20:15Z
Creation Date: 2000-03-05T21:23:48Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2018-03-05T21:23:48Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: Mesh Digital Limited
Registrar IANA ID: 1390
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Reseller:
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: C189074759-LROR
Registrant Name: IT Services Computer Centre
Registrant Organization: University of Bristol
Registrant Street: 5 Tyndall Avenue
Registrant City: Bristol
Registrant State/Province: BRISTOL
Registrant Postal Code: BS8 1UD
Registrant Country: GB
Registrant Phone: +44.1179287870
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: [email protected]
Registry Admin ID: C189074760-LROR
Admin Name: IT Services
Admin Organization: University of Bristol
Admin Street: 5 Tyndall Avenue
Admin City: Bristol
Admin State/Province: BRISTOL
Admin Postal Code: BS8 1UD
Admin Country: GB
Admin Phone: +44.1179287870
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: [email protected]
Registry Tech ID: C189074761-LROR
Tech Name: Webfusion Limited
Tech Organization: Webfusion Limited
Tech Street: 5 Roundwood Avenue
Tech City: Stockley Park
Tech State/Province: Uxbridge
Tech Postal Code: UB11 1FF
Tech Country: GB
Tech Phone: +44.8712309525
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: [email protected]
Name Server: IRIX.BRIS.AC.UK
Name Server: NCS.BRIS.AC.UK
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2017-07-15T06:32:32Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

Access to Public Interest Registry WHOIS information is provided to assist persons in determining the contents of a domain name registration record in the Public Interest Registry registry database. The data in this record is provided by Public Interest Registry for informational purposes only, and Public Interest Registry does not guarantee its accuracy. This service is intended only for query-based access. You agree that you will use this data only for lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this data to: (a) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission by e-mail, telephone, or facsimile of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations to entities other than the data recipient's own existing customers; or (b) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that send queries or data to the systems of Registry Operator, a Registrar, or Afilias except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or modify existing registrations. All rights reserved. Public Interest Registry reserves the right to modify these terms at any time. By submitting this query, you agree to abide by this policy.

  REFERRER http://www.pir.org/

  REGISTRAR Public Interest Registry

SERVERS

  SERVER org.whois-servers.net

  ARGS ilrt.org

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME ilrt.org

  HANDLE D21472152-LROR

  CREATED 2000-05-03

STATUS
clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  IRIX.BRIS.AC.UK 137.222.8.143

  NCS.BRIS.AC.UK 137.222.8.142

OWNER

  HANDLE C189074759-LROR

  NAME IT Services Computer Centre

  ORGANIZATION University of Bristol

ADDRESS

STREET
5 Tyndall Avenue

  CITY Bristol

  STATE BRISTOL

  PCODE BS8 1UD

  COUNTRY GB

  PHONE +44.1179287870

  EMAIL [email protected]

ADMIN

  HANDLE C189074760-LROR

  NAME IT Services

  ORGANIZATION University of Bristol

ADDRESS

STREET
5 Tyndall Avenue

  CITY Bristol

  STATE BRISTOL

  PCODE BS8 1UD

  COUNTRY GB

  PHONE +44.1179287870

  EMAIL [email protected]

TECH

  HANDLE C189074761-LROR

  NAME Webfusion Limited

  ORGANIZATION Webfusion Limited

ADDRESS

STREET
5 Roundwood Avenue

  CITY Stockley Park

  STATE Uxbridge

  PCODE UB11 1FF

  COUNTRY GB

  PHONE +44.8712309525

  EMAIL [email protected]

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .